A Global Epidemic-The Continuing Rise of Private Tutoring. Propagating More Inequality?

​​The Economist October 9th 2021 pp59-60 |InternationalPrivate Tutoring|”Smart buys” “Even before covid-19 growing numbers of parents were hiring private tutors for their children. The pandemic has accelerated that trend.”





Read The Economist for all the details


Summary offered by 2244


Austria, America, Greece, South Africa, Egypt, South Korea, Japan, Germany, Britain, India, Mexico, China and no doubt elsewhere parents with means have stepped up spending on private tutoring as they worry that the effectiveness of enrolled-school training waned during the pandemic.


Have children fallen behind in educational attainment as a result of the pandemic?


Experts in America estimate that “primary-age pupils are on average five months behind where they usually would be in maths and four months in reading, according to McKinsey.” The fallback could be worse in less wealthy nations.


How prevalent is the enrollment in private tutoring?


“The after-hours industry, sometimes dubbed ‘shadow education’, encompasses packed cram schools, one-to-one tutoring and paid online courses.” Enrollment, to any degree, is estimated at 80% in South Korea, 90% in Japan, 80% in Egypt, 18% in England and Wales, 41% in London, 40% in Germany and 29% in South Africa. As all were consumed initially with the pandemic or dealing with government mandates, participation fell early in the onset of COVID-19.


In addition to worries about less enducational achievement during the pandemic, what else is driving up spending in shadow education?


The rationale of course is hoping to improve a child’s odds of landing a sport in a leading university. There is also evidence to support that especially for poor children “high-quality test-preparation benefits them more than richer pupils.” Some trends have boosted the spending on private tutoring include having smaller families and having both parents fully employed. Some poorly funded private schools went under during the pandemic and now “governments in countries such as Britain and Australia are paying providers of private tutoring to participate in educational ‘catch-up’ schemes.


More education seems like a good thing, but what are the downsides?


Not all is good as some worry that “private tutoring can have pernicious effects” as teachers put more energy into shadow education than they do for the full time roles in public or private schools. Worse, “corrupt [teachers] may compel pupils to pay for extra lessons by leaving important material out of regular class time.” Another red flag is that worry that uneven access to extra lessons will widen educational inequality. Data, from England and Wales, suggests that 34% of the wealthy but only 20% of the poor parents “have ever paid for extra classes.”


How are policy-makers responding to concerns about the rise of private tutoring?


The practice of shadow schools became so pervasive in China that “In July China’s government banned tutoring during weekends and holidays and forbade providers from making a profit.” Elsewhere, in South Korea and Japan, policymakers rather than prohibit tutoring are trying to create “public alternatives to private cram schools. ”Mr Christensen (Aarhus University) suggests “We have to work out how to maximize the best aspects of it, and marginalize the worst.”